| Assessment and Problem Framing |
Student needs are vague or missing. Problem is unclear, lacks context. No meaningful connection to school culture or systemic issues. |
Describes the student’s needs but lacks depth or clarity. Problem is identified but not well-supported contextual discussion and it is not connected to school culture or systemic influences. |
Student needs are described. The problem is framed by the school context. Connections to school culture and systemic factors are made but may need more depth. |
Provides a well-articulated and comprehensive assessment of the student’s needs. The problem is clearly defined and situated within school culture and broader systemic issues. |
| Intervention Plan and Implementation |
Intervention plan is missing, unrealistic, or lacks coherence. |
A basic intervention plan is presented but lacks detail and the plan only includes one or two levels of intervention. |
Intervention plan is logical and includes micro, mezzo, and macro elements. Strategies are generally discussed but lack discussion of evidence. |
Presents a clear, feasible, and multilayered intervention plan with specific actions at all three levels. Integrates scientifically supported practices with strong justification for selected strategies |
| Resource Integration and Collaboration |
Few or no resources are identified. Collaboration is not discussed. |
Mentions some relevant resources and collaboration, but the discussion is limited or underdeveloped. |
Includes appropriate resources and outlines basic strategies for collaboration. |
Demonstrates thoughtful integration of relevant school, community, and technological resources. Collaboration is clearly planned. |
| Organization, Clarity, and APA Formatting |
The paper lacks clear organization; tone is informal or inappropriate for academic paper; |
Some organization is evident but ideas may be disjointed; tone is uneven or somewhat unprofessional; Citations and references are mostly missing or significantly flawed. |
The paper is generally well-organized with a mostly professional tone; minor APA formatting errors are present but do not detract significantly from clarity. |
The paper is clearly and logically organized with a consistently professional, action-oriented tone; APA citations and references are accurate and properly formatted throughout. |
| Following assignment requirements |
Does not follow the assignment description. |
Somewhat follows the assignment description, but significant errors exist. |
Follows the assignment description and requirements but has minor errors. |
Closely follows the assignment description and requirements. |