Location: CBC Campus - Tuesday T-336 & SWL-220 Time: Tuesdays and Thursdays from 5:30-8:15 Week 14: 11/18/19 — 11/24/19 Reading Assignment: DeCarlo (2018) chapter 13 Topic and Content Area: Qualitative Research Methods Assignments Due: Assignment 12: peer review research proposal is due Wednesday 11/20/19 at 11:55 PM via Moodle; Assignment 02: reading quiz for chapter 13 is due at 5:30 PM prior to class via My Heritage; Assignment 13: final paper literature review and research proposal is due Friday 11/22/19 at 11:55 PM via Chalk and Wire Other Important Information: N/A
Students will describe the key elements of interpretive research including methods, sample selection, and data analysis. Students will analyze interpretive research.
Positivistic Approach to Infidelity Track the number of people who engage in infidelity and how often they stray. Conduct a survey and look patterns among different variables defined at the start. Interpretative Approach to Infidelity Study the meaning attached to cheating and look for patterns and trends. Interview cheaters: What comprises “cheating”? Is it sex, or texting someone of the opposite sex? Is there a continuum? What meaning do we make from these behaviors?
Positivistic Approach to Prisons Measure the conditions of federal prisons Identify variables to measure conditions, such as square feet per inmate, number of hours in isolation, housing conditions,… etc. Interpretative Approach to Prisons Explore the experience of prisoners and/or guards and administrators. Research participants would explain their experiences, and the researcher would assign meaning to them. She might look for themes across interviews to interpret the experiences of multiple research participants. This is experience-near and in a context (prisons).
http://www.ipia.utah.edu/imps/html/research.html Interpretive methods focus on the meaning-making practices of human actors.  Rather than trying to define reality, interpretive methods explore how we make meaning, or interpret reality. Called qualitative research in some disciplines, it is conducted from an “experience-near perspective” – the researcher does not start with concepts observed and measured with the senses. Rather, she allows concepts to emerge from encounters in “the field.”
Case Study Ethnography Grounded theory Narrative inquiry Phenomenology
Case Study Ethnography Grounded theory Narrative inquiry Phenomenology Approach | Data Collection | Sample| Data Analysis | Final Product —- | —- | —- | —- | —- | —- Narrative: Explore the life on an individual Interviews and documents Typically one (sometimes more) person “Restorying,” developing themes, often use chronology Narrative about the stories of an individual’s life Phenomenology: Understand the essence of an experience Interviews, documents, observations Several individuals with the same lived experience Looking for significant statements, meaning units, describing the “essence” Description of the “essence” of an experience Grounded Theory: Develop a theory from data from the field Interviews Typically 20 to 60 individuals Coding, looking for themes, tying themes into a theory Generation of a theory illustrated in a figure Ethnography: Describe and interpret a culture-sharing group Primarily observations and interviews One culture-sharing group Deep description, identifying themes Description of how a culture-sharing group works Case Study: Provide an in-depth description of a case or group of cases Multiple sources (interview, observation, documents, etc.) Event, program, or activity Describing the case, identifying themes (cross-case themes) Detailed analysis of one or more cases
Participant Observation: The researcher observes participants in their natural environment, often times as a participant herself In-depth Interview: The researcher asks several, open-ended questions to explore participants’ personal histories, experiences, and perspectives Focus Group: The researcher asks in-depth questions of small groups of participants to explore their experiences, perspectives, and cultural norms
Studies conducted in the “natural setting” of participants Variables cannot be controlled and experimentally manipulated The questions are not always completely defined when research begins Data collected are heavily influenced by the experiences and priorities of research participants (they participate in the process of research) Meanings are drawn from the data using processes that are natural/familiar (for example: observations and interviews rather than experiments)
Researcher must be aware of her own biases and intentional about describing them Data collection is often collegiate, where research participants share their stories and the researcher is up-front about her understanding/interpretation Many studies depend upon multiple sources of data (different groups of participants) and multiple collection methods (interviews and observation, and analysis of documents).
The goal of an interpretive study is to identify relationships between the major themes that emerge from the data. How do we do this? Use diagraming and other visual techniques to spatially sort themes according to how related they are Look for missing links Count the number of times a theme appears Note contradictory evidence
Useful for exchanging complex information versus operational definitions You can ask follow-up questions People’s stories Lengthy explanations Participants can reflect out loud about their responses Studying processes
Interview Transcript – A Teacher’s Observations of Child Oppression https://study.sagepub.com/node/31740/student-resources/chapter-5