A presentation slide titled 'Using an Ethical Principle Screen and Decision Making' for Fall 2026 Week 06 of SOWK 587, featuring a simple flowchart with arrows progressing from 'Yes' (green square) to 'No' (red octagon) against a black background. Authored by Jacob Campbell, Ph.D. LICSW at Heritage University.
A presentation slide for Week Six with a two-column layout: black left section shows agenda items (Plan for the week, Ethical principle screen, Steps in decision making, Case example); bright pink right section lists learning objectives to define the Ethical Principle Screen (EPS) and examine a case study using decision-making steps.
Course slide titled 'Activities for Week Six' displaying assigned readings (School Social Work Chapter 6 on ethical dilemmas, Group Counseling: LGBTQI Persons Chapter 8) and requirements: make three forum replies discussing LGBTQI challenges, FERPA/confidentiality ethics, and ethical dilemmas, plus submit an ethical decision-making video presentation assignment.
A gradient triangle (pink to yellow) labeled 'Ethical Principles Screen - Key Ethical Assessment Tool' displays seven core ethical principles: Protection of Life, Social Justice, Self Determination/Autonomy/Freedom, Least Harm, Quality of Life, Privacy and Confidentiality, and Truthfulness and Full Disclosure, with a pointer indicating assessment position. Attribution: Dolgoff et al., 2012.
A slide titled 'Ethical Principles Screen: How We Conceptualize The EPS' presents an ethical decision-making framework. It poses 'Is protection of life of concern?' and explains that when dilemmas involve multiple principles, a higher-order principle takes precedence over lower-order ones. A blue section lists three considerations: Impartiality, Generalization, and Justifiability, per Dolgoff et al., 2012.
A presentation slide titled 'Decision Making: Steps to Take' displays six decision-making steps on the left and six corresponding steps on the right, including: determine the issue and gather information, separate practice issues from ethics, identify conflicting values, get help, identify alternatives, evaluate costs and benefits, clarify your own values, decide priority rationally, and record decisions in case notes. The slide is attributed to Jacob Campbell, Ph.D., LICSW at Heritage University, from Fall 2026 SOWK 587, citing Jarolmen & Bautista-Thomas (2023, p. 139).
A white head silhouette labeled 'Client Example (Gerold)' on a black background is paired with case information describing a client eligible for the Bridges Program under IEP with reading, writing, math, social/emotional, behavior, and communication needs in the health-impaired category. The client has an ADHD diagnosis, and the key challenge noted is 'Delimma: Transition planning goals beyond perceived capacity.'