Fall 2025 SOWk 581 Week 06 - Objects Relations Theory & Self-Psychology

Fall 2025 SOWk 581 Week 06 - Objects Relations Theory & Self-psychology

title: Fall 2025 SOWk 581 Week 06 - Objects Relations Theory & Self-Psychology date: 2025-10-03 00:31:01 location: Heritage University tags:

Heritage University
MSW Program
SOWK 581 presentation_video: > “” description: >

Week six is a synchronous class week, with an in-person session on Saturday (10/04). Having spent time in class examining the theoretical basis of an integrated approach to clinical practice, the assessment process, biopsychosocial assessments, the DSM-5-TR, and multicultural practice, we will now focus on specific practice implementations within the integrated approach. I do have an activity where we will be reviewing the DSM, and I would like you to bring your copy with you to class. This week’s readings include two chapters from Cooper and Granucci’s Lesser (2022) work, which presents two relational psychodynamic models: object relations theory and self-psychology. The agenda for the in-class session includes:

Discuss the psychosocial assessment assignment
Examples of understanding and applying object relation theory to a client
Reviewing components of self-psychology
Empathetic responding practice
Examining the diagnosis of ADHD

The Learning Objectives this Week include:

Explain key concepts of object relations theory and self-psychology and apply them to client case examples.
Describe the therapeutic role of the clinician in relational psychodynamic approaches
Demonstrate empathic communication through structured practice with case vignettes.
Critically evaluate the diagnostic criteria for ADHD through the lens of self-psychology, with attention to the child’s self-experience.
Explain key concepts of object relations theory and self-psychology and apply them to client case examples.
Describe the therapeutic role of the clinician in relational psychodynamic approaches
Demonstrate empathic communication through structured practice with case vignettes.
Critically evaluate the diagnostic criteria for ADHD through the lens of self-psychology, with attention to the child’s self-experience.

Assignment 04a: Psychosocial Assessment (1 of 2) Assignment

[Whole Group Activity] Review the assignment

Meta: Points 100 pts (20% of final grade); Deadline Monday 10/20/25 at 08:00 AM; Completion via Anthology accessible through MyHeritage Assignments; Locations Assignments Submission for Anthology Portfolio and Assignment Description and Rubric

Purpose: Assessment is a key aspect of direct practice, and a social worker’s ability to effectively engage with a client is vital to completing a meaningful assessment. Psychosocial assessments are a common tool and provide a framework for evaluating cultural factors.

Task: The psychosocial assessment is a key assignment for SOWK 581. Students will demonstrate their competency in engagement. Heritage’s MSW Program includes two practice behaviors in assessing engagement. The first involves evaluating cultural factors, and the second consists of using culturally responsive engagement methods.

For this assignment, students will conduct a psychosocial assessment with a client they are using in their case study. The final product will have two broad components. The majority of the content will be the actual evaluation documentation. Cooper and Granucci Lesser (2022) include a discussion regarding the implementation of psychosocial assessment. Students will develop their own form but will follow the headings listed in chapter three (e.g., Identifying Information, Referral Source, Presenting Problem, cultural/spirituality, etc.). Students can use the same chapter’s section, “The Case of Vincent,” as an exemplar. This psychosocial assessment is related to the case study assignment. The documentation will be based on your interview with a client at your practicum placement. The second component is a section at the end reflecting on the experience of assessing the client and how you built meaningful engagement and used culturally responsive methods. The assessment should include evaluating those cultural factors at all levels of interaction (e.g., individual, family, groups, organizations, and communities).

Success: Students will be assessed using the Psychosocial Assessment and Competency 6 Rubric. A successful assessment will follow documentation best practices, gathering comprehensive data about the client’s needs, demonstrating alignment throughout the assessment, and following the assignment description. Students also need to demonstrate competency in evaluating cultural factors and using culturally responsive engagement strategies.

Assignment 04a: Psychosocial Assessment (2 of 2) Rubric

[Whole Group Activity] Review highly developed on the rubric

Appendix A: Psychosocial Assessment and Competency 6 Practice Behavior Rubric

The Psychosocial Assessment and Competency Six Rubric is used to evaluate the psychosocial assessment that students complete in SOWK 581. It serves two parts. First, it evaluates Heritage University’s Specialized Practice behavior for engaging with clients, specifically assessing cultural factors to develop engagement and the use of culturally responsive engagement. Second, it assesses the assignment by examining whether best practices are followed for documentation, the evaluation is comprehensive, if there is alignment throughout the evaluation, and if the assignment tasks are followed.

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and/or Communities.

a. Evaluate cultural factors which build meaningful engagement with diverse client populations. b. Utilize a variety of culturally responsive engagement methods to promote healing and wellbeing.

Description	Initial	Emerging	Developed	Highly Developed
Evaluating cultural factors to develop engagement	There is little to no reflection on cultural factors and no apparent connection to building engagement with diverse client populations. Context is generally ignored.	The reflection makes a minimal attempt to discuss cultural factors and their implications for working with diverse clients. Some essential contextual factors are missing or underdeveloped.	The reflection discusses cultural factors, but connections to working with diverse client populations or building engagement may lack depth or clarity. Contexts are mentioned but not fully explored.	The reflection includes a clear, understandable discussion of how cultural factors were evaluated. It connects the evaluation to the implications of working with diverse client populations and details how engagement was built. Contextual factors such as family, groups, organizations, and communities are fully explored.
Using culturally responsive engagement	The reflection lacks a straightforward and precise application of culturally responsive methods.	There is minimal evidence that the student tailored their interventions to promote healing and well-being, and any attempts to do so lack depth or clarity. The reflection provides little consideration of multiple levels of interaction (e.g., individual, family, groups, organizations, and communities).	The reflection describes using culturally responsive methods but may lack specific examples or depth. The student may have tailored their interventions but have not clearly articulated them. The student did not fully consider multiple levels of interaction (e.g., individual, family, groups, organizations, and communities).	The reflection comprehensively describes how they engaged in culturally responsive methods. At least three examples of how you tailored your practice to promote healing and well-being. The reflection highlights the student’s ability to modify and tailor interventions at multiple levels (e.g., individual, family, groups, and organizations) to ensure the client’s dignity and empowerment throughout the process.

General Components of the Psychosocial Evaluation

Description	Initial	Emerging	Developed	Highly Developed
Documentation follows best practices	The psychosocial evaluation does not follow the general norms for clinical documentation, and the documentation contains many major problems.	The psychosocial evaluation generally follows the norms for clinical documentation but has some more significant errors or problems found in the documentation.	The psychosocial evaluation generally follows the norms for clinical documentation but has a couple of areas with more minor errors or problems.	The psychosocial evaluation follows general norms for clinical documentation in how it is written. Examples include using professional and neutral language, writing with clarity and precision, balanced use of subjective and objective information with clear distinctions, use of client-centered language, and a cogent organizational style.
The evaluation will be comprehensive gathering the necessary information about client needs	The psychosocial assessment greatly lacks the information needed for a comprehensive psychosocial evaluation.	The psychosocial assessment is missing one or two of the required sections to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Many of the sections seem underdescribed and appear to be missing relevant information that should have been gathered.	The psychosocial assessment gathers information about the client’s needs in all required areas. One or two sections are underdeveloped and appear to be missing relevant information.	The information gathered in the psychosocial evaluation will provide a comprehensive overview of the client’s needs. It will include information collected related to identifying information, referral source, presenting problem, developmental assessment, family background, personal history, medical history, educational/learning history, social class, cultural history, religion/spiritual, mental status and current functioning, summary, recommendations, and intersection client/worker relationship.
The evaluation contains alignment and develops a deep understanding of the client	There is a lack of alignment between what is presented in the client’s history/presenting problem and the interpretations and recommendations made in the assessment.	The assessment has more significant problems with alignment between the client’s history/presenting problem and the interpretations and recommendations made in the evaluation.	The assessment generally aligns with the description of the client’s history/presenting problem and the clinician’s interpretations and recommendations. There are some minor discrepancies, where it appears the information was not collected or was unnoticed by the writer.	The assessment develops a complete picture of the client. The information gathered about the client’s history/presenting problem sections connects to the social worker’s interpretations and recommendations (e.g., mental status, summary, and recommendations). Any significant discrepancies are discussed.
Following Assignment	The case study does not follow the assignment description and requirements.	The case study somewhat follows the assignment description, but significant errors exist.	The case study follows the assignment description and requirements but has minor errors.	The case study closely follows the assignment description and requirements.

Five Assumptions of Time Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy

There are five basic assumptions in time limited dynamic psychotherapy

Maladaptive relationship patterns are learned in the past: Relationships with early caregivers will become organized and both affectively and cognitively encoded as interpersonal schemas through which the child, and later the adult, filters the world. (Examples of multigenerational gang involvement, parents anxiety transfering to child, etc.)
Such maladaptive patterns are maintained in the present: Although a dysfunctional interactional style is learned in childhood, it must be supported in the adult’s current life for the interpersonal difficulties to continue. (There is something keeping going, enabling, homeostasis, etc.)
Dysfunctional relationship patterns are re-enacted in vivo in therapy: The patient interacts with the therapist in the same dysfunctional way that characterizes her interactions with others in her life and tries to enlist the therapist to play a complementary role. (This becomes a place to address and bring up maladaptive patters)
The therapeutic relationship has a dyadic quality: The relational-interactionist position of TLDP is that the therapist will experience an “interpersonal countertransference” that involves her acting in a way that the patient expects. The therapist must recognize this replication of the patient’s earlier dysfunctional relational pattern and use this information to change the nature of the interaction in a more positive way.
The TLDP focus is on the child problematic relationship pattern: The emphasis in TLDP is on assessing and intervening in the patient’s most pervasive and problematic style of relating.

(Cooper & Granucci Lesser, 2022)

Object Relation Theory and Example of Youth M

I like to go through some of the aspects of object relation theory related to a youth I had previous worked with (ML-41901).

As I read the case of Jane and her case using the present to transcend the past:

Client info

When I started working with, wa a a 7 yo AA youth in foster care w/ grandparents
Placed in our behavioral classroom

History of presenting problem

Dxs of Reactive Attachment Disorder, ADHD, PTSD, Depression, and Anxiety
Problems with refusal, physically acting out, eloping, and theft

I have a bowl of fruit, because I distinctively remember being in a large WISe meeting spent talking about food hording (all of the people present, educating/problem solving)

When we look at his Expecationstions of Others Reactions and Acts of of Others Towards Self

So many of his actions could be traced back to his past, removal, being based on history

He very clearly internalized (e.g., acts of the self toward the self) his need to hide and horde food, to not feel smart enough in school, that people would take from him and so he should take from them first.

Goals we had included teaching to idneifyi his triggers and learn about the cycle of emotional regulation.

Self-Psychology: General Overview

Self-psychology can be understood within the conceptual frame of developmental psychology with links to attachment; mentalization (the growth of a child’s capacity to understand interpersonal behavior in terms of mental states)

The Self: The self is considered the core of an individual’s personality, encompassing one’s sense of identity, coherence, and continuity.
Selfobject Needs: Selfobjects are people or things that fulfill essential psychological functions for the self, helping maintain its cohesion and vitality.
- Mirroring: The need to have one’s abilities and accomplishments recognized and affirmed by others. This validation fosters self-esteem and confidence.
- Idealization: The need to look up to significant others (parents, mentors) for strength and guidance. Idealizing others helps individuals internalize values and standards.
- Twinship (Alter Ego): The need to feel a sense of likeness or belonging with others. This connection fosters a sense of community and acceptance.

(Cooper & Granucci Lesser, 2022)

Role of the Therapist in Self-Psychology

In self-psychology, The patient’s experiences of the therapist were then felt to be distortions based on projections that the therapist interpreted… we become integral to the change process with the client through our relationship and connection. In this model, sometimes it will look like:

Patient’s feelings are viewed as being determined by past experience and the relationship with the therapist in the present
Kohut suggested that patients come to therapy to learn to self-sooth, self-comfort and self-empathize; these capabilities are initially provided by the therapist as the self-object
Optimal frustration: minor experiences of the therapist’s empathic failures
Optimal frustration experiences help the patient learn to tolerate frustration and cope with ungratified needs
Optimal frustration has been reframed to “optimal responsiveness,” which stresses empathic understanding as fundamental to the therapeutic process

(Cooper & Granucci Lesser, 2022)

Examining Diagnosis of ADHD

Review criteria in the DSM-5-TR and Small Group Discussion of relationship with Self-Psychology

When a child is not able to make sense of her experiences, and when there is additionally a discordance between the personal meanings the child ascribes to her experiences and the beliefs others (including parents, family members, and educators) have about the child’s experiences, the child becomes vulnerable to problems ranging from struggles with self-esteem to disorders of the self. Treatment of children with learning disorders from a self-psychological perspective revolves around the centrality of the child’s self-experience. This includes working with children (and their caregivers) to identify the development of maladaptive defenses before they become part of the structure of the personality. (Cooper & Granucci Lesser, 2022, p. 100)